We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

LQ - Escade's Residence Question
#1

http://thesouthpacific.x10.mx/thread-2294.html

Given that the Court has already ruled on this I don't believe we should take any action here.  I suggest we ask if she still has a question and if not close the thread.
#2

Agreed.

#3

Given the update to the question, I do not believe the law allows a criminal to be charged in absentia. I think Escade may be right that fleeing the region allows one to avoid criminal charges.

#4

Yeah. That is an issue in the law.
#5

It's an issue in the law, but it's not our power to rule on what it should be, only as it is.

I say we dismiss it as the issue has been previously ruled on.
#6

The Assembly would probably be better suited to that issue. Agree to dismiss.





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .