[DISCUSSION] Repeal "Prohibiting Animal Abuse" |
Repeal "Prohibiting Animal Abuse"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation. Category: Repeal | Proposal: GA#335 | Proposed by: Imperium Anglorum Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #335: Prohibiting Animal Abuse (Category: Moral Decency; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void. Argument: Applauding the World Assembly’s stance on the paternal and protectively patronising treatment of animals, Bemoaning the inherent problems and uncaught exceptions of large overreaching legislation, not matter the author, and, Believing that the provisions set forth in this resolution are too broad and in the end, self-destructive of animal and sapient rights, This august World Assembly;
This is the discussion thread. For voting, please click here. Advisory Opinion: With the intention of repealing "Prohibiting Animal Abuse", this proposal addresses the many flaws that the previously-passed bill contained, such as being attempting to internationally dictate what member-states should or should not do on a national scale. Advisory Vote: Aye
A Lovely Insane Sòlda Mèt
Sòlda Mèt of the South Pacific Special Forces Former World Assembly Advisor
Obviously as I voted for this first time around I'm against the repeal! :tounge: While agreeing that the original legislation could have been better written I'd have preferred to have seen a proposal for superseding legislation rather than a repeal, hence by nay (or given the subject should that be 'neigh!') vote.
(07-20-2015, 07:19 AM)Hopolis Wrote: Obviously as I voted for this first time around I'm against the repeal! :tounge: While agreeing that the original legislation could have been better written I'd have preferred to have seen a proposal for superseding legislation rather than a repeal, hence by nay (or given the subject should that be 'neigh!') vote. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think one can write another proposal addressing the same issues without repealing the first?
A Lovely Insane Sòlda Mèt
Sòlda Mèt of the South Pacific Special Forces Former World Assembly Advisor (07-20-2015, 05:39 PM)Alisa Wrote:(07-20-2015, 07:19 AM)Hopolis Wrote: Obviously as I voted for this first time around I'm against the repeal! :tounge: While agreeing that the original legislation could have been better written I'd have preferred to have seen a proposal for superseding legislation rather than a repeal, hence by nay (or given the subject should that be 'neigh!') vote. I believe you're correct on that. I voted Nay on this because the legislation in question was passed not 2 weeks ago and I don't think proposals should be passed and insta-repealed like this. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |