Poll: Should the following amendment be passed? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Aye | 12 | 42.86% | |
Nay | 12 | 42.86% | |
Abstain | 4 | 14.29% | |
Total | 28 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
FAILED: Amendment to Article X.3 of the Charter (Roavin) |
The following legislation has received a motion and a second. Legislators may vote Aye, Nay or abstain from voting. The vote will remain open for 5 days and this bill will require a majority three-fifths (or 60%) of the votes in favor in order to become law.
A countdown timer is available here: Link Below is the following legislation: Quote:3. The military may engage in non-destructive offensive or defensive operations without fear of political reprisal. Destroying, colonizing, or annexing a region requires express majority approval from the Cabinet. Further discussion can be found here: Link
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)
Local Council Member(April 24-August 11) Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)
So, this vote ended almost at week ago, and before the LC ever set up a poll or cast their bloc vote. Per this court ruling, an absent LC Rep means the LC bloc vote can't be cast: http://tspforums.xyz/thread-4258-post-13...#pid133584
With 12 Ayes, 12 Nays, and 4 Abstentions, the this amendment fails with 50% of approval and 50% of disapproval.
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)
Local Council Member(April 24-August 11) Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7) |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |