We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Poll: Should the following amendment be passed?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Aye
42.86%
12 42.86%
Nay
42.86%
12 42.86%
Abstain
14.29%
4 14.29%
Total 28 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

FAILED: Amendment to Article X.3 of the Charter (Roavin)
#1

The following legislation has received a motion and a second. Legislators may vote Aye, Nay or abstain from voting. The vote will remain open for 5 days and this bill will require a majority three-fifths (or 60%) of the votes in favor in order to become law.

A countdown timer is available here: Link

Below is the following legislation:

Quote:3. The military may engage in non-destructive offensive or defensive operations without fear of political reprisal. Destroying, colonizing, or annexing a region requires express majority approval from the Cabinet.

Further discussion can be found here: Link
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)

Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)

Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)


#2

So, this vote ended almost at week ago, and before the LC ever set up a poll or cast their bloc vote. Per this court ruling, an absent LC Rep means the LC bloc vote can't be cast: http://tspforums.xyz/thread-4258-post-13...#pid133584
#3

With 12 Ayes, 12 Nays, and 4 Abstentions, the this amendment fails with 50% of approval and 50% of disapproval.
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)

Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)

Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)






Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .