We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Prohibited Group Status for The Black Hawks
#51

I'll try to restrict CRS reform talks, but ... it's kinda inherent to my argument Tounge . One of the few powers the CRS has under the Charter is denying legislator applications. If waltzing in became a problem, it could already be dealt with now.

Honestly, I don't feel strongly about making TBH a PGO, because it really wouldn't do much except get rid of one legislator that seems to legitimately want to get involved. I just think we're overlooking the more fundamental issues, which (if approached) could also lead to us dealing with this in a much more nuanced (beyond just "BLOCK THE ENTIRE ORG" or "LET THEM ALL IN").
[Image: XXPV74Y.png?1]
#52
Bug 
Come on, Cormac. You help TBH get a second condemnation and are now trying to get them PGO?

You're giving them way too much credit. It's like you're on a quest to make them seem cooler than they are, and you know, they aren't very cool. Any region that prides themselves in tag-raiding records should immediately be considered a non-threat.  :sleepy:




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .