Users browsing this thread:

North Prarie · 03-03-2018, 03:55 PM

This seems like a good plan, as really only Kringle is the judge rn.

Midwesterner. Political nerd. Chipotle enthusiast.
Minister of Culture of the South Pacific // Former Prime Minister

***Roavin*** · 03-04-2018, 12:54 PM

So, I'd like to move forward on this. Here are the remaining addressable topics as I see them:

Is 72 hours too short of a minimum case time?
Should sentencing be separate from a criminal case?

***Roavin*** · 03-06-2018, 04:26 AM

Barring discussion, I intend to motion this to vote on Friday.

Gesendet von meinem TA-1032 mit Tapatalk

**Belschaft** · 03-06-2018, 03:43 PM

I don't share your enthusiasm for this, but it's not horrifically broken and/or horrible. It also corrects a couple of omissions in the current law re; appeals, burdens, etc.

I'd rate it "better than what we currently have".

_{Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making}
^{Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator}

PREVIOUS ROLES

**Belschaft** · 03-06-2018, 08:41 PM

Article 7.2 could probably do with something along the line of factual error/new evidence included.

_{Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making}
^{Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator}

PREVIOUS ROLES

***Roavin*** · 03-10-2018, 04:59 AM

Hm, that's an entirely new thing. I'll start a new thread on that.

For now, I'll motion this for a vote.

**USoVietnam** · 03-10-2018, 09:43 AM

Second.

Chief Supervising Armchair

***Roavin*** · 03-23-2018, 04:04 AM

A quick update from the Cabinet: Due to various circumstances (including RL circumstances), we don't have the two nominees for associate Justice yet. We are working hard at it together with Chief Justice Kris, though, and should have nominees very, very soon.