(11-18-2014, 10:32 PM)Unibot Wrote:

Quote:The Parole Board is made up of admirable South Pacific citizens who want to do their best by this region. However, if it is enough to merely "not coup" another region and contribute abroad to demonstrate reformation and restitution, it seems that almost any criminal well...ever could be allowed back onto the forum.

On the contrary, most coupers do not reform their behavior as Milograd has. Most do not admit what they did was wrong and most continue behavior that either suggests they would be capable of committing such acts again, or do commit it again.

Who would reform their behavior?

JAL? Nope.
Sedgistan? He won't apologise for what he did.
Moldavi? Hah!
Mallorea? You kidding me?
Westwind? Don't count on it.
Biyah? Bahaha.
Mammo? Wasn't that his purpose in life!?

Milograd is a special case of someone who came out and apologised after the event and hasn't shown an inkling of wanting to do what he did again. I'm not sure the Parole Board can ever satisfy you, HEM, but we followed the law and protocol set out and Milograd did meet them. 

The entire point of my essay was to assert that even if he did apologize, his remorse is a downright sham. For shame Unibot, you churn out thousands of words in essays, but couldn't be bothered to read my article?

HEM Wrote:his remorse is a downright sham.

Can you prove this?

(11-19-2014, 01:18 AM)TAC Wrote:

HEM Wrote:his remorse is a downright sham.

Can you prove this?

Well, that's what I attempted to do in my article. The fact that he betrayed us initially, despite his "service" for the region, shows that he is willing to manipulate to get what he wants. The fact that he basically mocked us as he left, promising that we would "elect him as Delegate again" pretty much shows what he is angling for now. He has proven time and time again that he is not to be trusted, and that his motives are never as pure as he may pretend.

On the contrary, all of those statements are past tense. Can you present something from I don't know... this year?

(11-19-2014, 01:22 AM)TAC Wrote: On the contrary, all of those statements are past tense. Can you present something from I don't know... this year?

My argument is that he is in a process of manipulating us based on his past tendency to do so. If he was scattering evidence of this manipulation around presently, it wouldn't be a very good manipulation.

This is like you asking Charlie Brown from Peanuts what evidence he has that Lucy is going to pull the football away from him after inviting him to kick it. The evidence is that it has happened before, and he downright promised that it would happen again.

HEM Wrote:The evidence is that it has happened before, and he downright promised that it would happen again.

Mind providing a link to such a statement by Milo?

(11-19-2014, 01:40 AM)TAC Wrote:

HEM Wrote:The evidence is that it has happened before, and he downright promised that it would happen again.

Mind providing a link to such a statement by Milo?

Last part of my article, the image at the end:

[Image: a14tco.png]

There is nothing in that image that supports the assumption that he will coup again.

(11-19-2014, 01:54 AM)TAC Wrote: There is nothing in that image that supports the assumption that he will coup again.

As the door hits him on the way out, he goads us about essentially being stupid enough to elect him Delegate someday again.

...Yeah that was a totally innocent statement. :dodgy:

That was merely your interpretation of it, albeit completely outlandish how you pulled that assumption out.