I must ask who the big five are.

(07-01-2015, 10:03 PM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: We are concerned about expulsion (...) that what happened to Qvait will happen to us.

You fear that if you are busted planning to overthrow the government of a member nation you will be expelled from the Organisation?

(07-01-2015, 10:03 PM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: We no longer feel that our opinion matters, because you already seemed decided on the majority of your resolutions, most recently, your lack of willingness to negotiate on the very Expulsion you have mentioned. We feel that you already know you have a majority, and that the only reason you even bother bringing it before the rest of us is simply to say, "This is going to happen." We feel collectively alienated, to say the very least. Some of us, for example, the one who brought up possible expulsion, are worried that we will get removed from the organization if we put up any resistance.

I am purposefully roleplaying the Kringalian Government as aggressive and uncompromising. As has been hinted here, here and here, the current administration will take Kringalia down a more militaristic and less diplomacy-oriented path. In accordance with the timeline I developed months ago, this trend will continue for a while, until the Progressives regain enough influence to win a presidential election.

Now, let's talk about my OOC thoughts on Qvait's expulsion. I did not even consider expulsion until the Carlston Leak, when that option became completely justified. Previous to that, even when some members had asked me to support expelling Qvait, I didn't give it much thought. You proposed lessening the condemnation of Darkstrait and Qvait. Personally, I would've downgraded it from expulsion to suspension, since Sporaltryus committed henious crimes and was only suspended. However, my IC policies aren't about being lenient, they are about protecting Kringalia's interests, and those interests mean being tough on pro-Ryccian nations, and disregarding anyone who isn't politically close to Kringalia.

We can keep arguing about why I alienate people, but the truth is that I am following my IC policies, and even then I often break the fourth wall to prevent stuff. Case in point, when I contacted most SCO members to keep Sporaltryus and Awesomiasa from trying to declare war, even when war would've been within my IC interests. I hate having to be IC mean, but that's how things are.

So, you are militant and unforgiving, and all of your friends are militant and unforgiving(IC, of course).


Don't mind me I'm just on Tapatalk

Wow. Calling me unforgiving.


~Professor Henn, Hardcore Leftist, Totally not a Dinosaur

(07-01-2015, 10:20 PM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: So, you are militant and unforgiving (IC, of course).

Pretty much, yes.

I mean, I literally do have a plan for my IC conduct during the next couple of months, so I really am being an ass on purpose, not because I don't think your opinions matter: http://i.imgur.com/JMrZ2N8.png?1

(Yes, I know the image is too small. It's just so you know that I actually do have a plan written down)

(07-01-2015, 10:20 PM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: So, you are militant and unforgiving, and all of your friends are militant and unforgiving(IC, of course).


Don't mind me I'm just on Tapatalk

I'll would let him be... Is the way he planned his nation's history.

Why don't you begin proposing programmes you'd like to implement with us? It's not as if we are all militaristic.

1.) Do you have a bigger Version of that?

2.) Ok then, also, I would ask that you take a look at my proposed amendment to the Charter. The only person who's even bothered to reply so far is Henn.
http://thesouthpacific.x10.mx/thread-2737.html

Federation, his plans are effectively national secrets. He is not about to hand them out.


~Professor Henn, Hardcore Leftist, Totally not a Dinosaur

I actually didn't read the parentheses.


Don't mind me I'm just on Tapatalk

(07-01-2015, 10:37 PM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: 1.) Do you have a bigger Version of that?

2.) Ok then, also, I would ask that you take a look at my proposed amendment to the Charter. The only person who's even bothered to reply so far is Henn.
http://thesouthpacific.x10.mx/thread-2737.html

Interestingly enough, I am not set out to blindly oppose everything you do. I was going to support your proposal today, but went out with some friends, so I haven't had time yet. Yeah, I will oppose everything you do.

About my plans...let's just say the Walsh Administration will have the fate it deserves, in due course. Maybe not. Maybe the Walsh legacy will last well into 2016.

--

Edit: actually...your recent behaviour on IRC has made me reconsider. Once the withdrawal amendment passes, I hope you take the hint and get the hell out of the SCO.