The South Pacific
[PASSED] A2201.07 Regional Communications Act - Replacing CRS with CG - Printable Version

+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html)
+------ Forum: Voting Chamber (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-83.html)
+------ Thread: [PASSED] A2201.07 Regional Communications Act - Replacing CRS with CG (/thread-10171.html)

[PASSED] A2201.07 Regional Communications Act - Replacing CRS with CG - anjo - 01-24-2022

Legislators of the South Pacific,

There has been a seconded motion to bring an amendment to the Regional Communications Act to vote. The debate thread can be found here.

This is an amendment to general legislation, according to the Legislative Procedure Act requiring a majority greater than 50% to pass. The voting period will be 3 days, thus concluding on .

Please vote by poll if possible. If you cannot vote by poll, post 'Aye', 'Nay' or 'Abstain' in this thread. Please do not vote both by poll and by post. Comments and discussions belong in the debate thread and should be posted there.

Regional Communications Act
...

2. Mass Communication

...

(3) The World Factbook Entry must visibly contain:
a. a link to the off-site forums and Discord server of the Coalition,
b. a request for nations to endorse the lawful Delegate,
c. a request for nations to endorse the Council on Regional SecurityCoral Guard and a link to a Dispatch containing the current membership of the Council on Regional SecurityCoral Guard,
d. a link to information about the endorsement cap.


RE: [AT VOTE] A2201.07 Regional Communications Act - Replacing CRS with CG - anjo - 01-27-2022

Final Result
Amendment to the Regional Communications Act - Replacing CRS with CG
[Image: 1YKuNcb.png]
Ayes: 42
87.5% | 97.7% (discounting abstentions)
Nays: 1
2.1% | 2.3% (discounting abstentions)
There were 5 Abstentions (10.4%); 36 legislators were absent. Thus, attendance for this vote was 57.1%.
In light of these results, the proposal passes, having achieved the required majority (>50%).