[PASSED] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html) +----- Thread: [PASSED] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter (/thread-10545.html) |
|
[PASSED] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - Belschaft - 06-11-2022 As promised. Quote:VI. THE EXECUTIVE RE: [AMMENDMENT] Abolishing MoM - Amendment to Article 6 of the Charter - rosaferri - 06-11-2022 Can't say I'm unsurprised by this one :p I voted for ya, so I guess there's not much else to say outside of this RE: [AMMENDMENT] Abolishing MoM - Amendment to Article 6 of the Charter - A bee - 06-12-2022 I've voted for this ''Albert Ca''...''Cah-mus''... too and I say, let bygones be bygones. RE: [DRAFT] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — Amendment to Article 6 of the Charter - The Haughtherlands - 06-12-2022
RE: [DRAFT] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - im_a_waffle1 - 06-12-2022 Full support RE: [DRAFT] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - Farengeto - 06-12-2022 Just for the purpose of being legally unambiguous here, I would suggest some kind of resolution with this amendment making it clear what happens with shutting down the ministry and the dismissal of the minister. (e.g. The minister being dismissed immediately after its passage vs serving out the remainder of the term.) Best not to have a defunct ministry floating around in a legally ambiguous state for the rest of the term if we can avoid it. RE: [DRAFT] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - Comfed - 06-12-2022 (06-12-2022, 10:45 PM)Farengeto Wrote: Just for the purpose of being legally unambiguous here, I would suggest some kind of resolution with this amendment making it clear what happens with shutting down the ministry and the dismissal of the minister. (e.g. The minister being dismissed immediately after its passage vs serving out the remainder of the term.) Agreed, something along the lines of this: Upon the passage of this amendment, the Ministry of Media will be dissolved in its entirety and the Minister of Media will be removed from office. RE: [DRAFT] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - Jay Coop - 06-13-2022 In any event, should this bill pass, I will consider the ministry abolished with immediate effect. RE: [DRAFT] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - BlockBuster2K43 - 06-13-2022 I’m assuming that the roles and responsibilities of the Ministry of Media will be passed onto other ministries within the South Pacific? RE: [DRAFT] [2227.AB] Abolishing MoM — AMoMendment to Article 6 of the Charter - Jebediah - 06-13-2022 (06-12-2022, 10:45 PM)Farengeto Wrote: Just for the purpose of being legally unambiguous here, I would suggest some kind of resolution with this amendment making it clear what happens with shutting down the ministry and the dismissal of the minister. (e.g. The minister being dismissed immediately after its passage vs serving out the remainder of the term.) I'd think this wouldn't too much of an issue. From the perspective of the law, the Ministry just wouldn't exist any more - the Minister wouldn't have any legal role or position, the assets just wouldn't be owned by any one, etc. The Ministry would just disappear - we don't have any assets/wages/contracts/etc. to worry about, so there isn't any problem with this. The only reason we should need to pass a resolution alongside this is if we wanted to delay the actual removal of the ministry until the next election or something similar, which there seems to be a consensus on not doing. |