The South Pacific
Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - Printable Version

+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html)
+------ Forum: Private Halls of the Assembly (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-95.html)
+------ Thread: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order (/thread-2220.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - southern bellz - 04-13-2015

Should the New Pacific Order be a prohibited group?

They have have successfully manipulated relations with multiple regions to ultimately gain control of fellow GCR, Lazarus.  They now have posted that they consider occupying a GCR and redirecting it to their forum, not a violation of regional sovereignty, which would make The South Pacific a target for such takeovers.  

On top of this, they have shown a willingness to abandon their NPO status when convient in order to seem more dedicated see the below quote from AMOM:

Quote:I abandoned my position as an NPO Senator for the sake of my dedication to The East Pacific, but let's face it: I'm NPO through and through. I always was, I still am, and I always will be.

Does this mean we should consider making everyone who was ever involved with the NPO part of this group, especially due to the fact that membership is selective and close nit? 


RE: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - southern bellz - 04-13-2015

Also, I believe we have at least one member of the NPO as a current citizen, how will that impact them?


Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - ProfessorHenn - 04-13-2015

Making everyone what? You kind of fell off there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


RE: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - Unibot - 04-13-2015

It's affect a few people but I don't have time to build a full list yet.


RE: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - southern bellz - 04-13-2015

Thank you for your intel, Unibot.


Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - ProfessorHenn - 04-13-2015

It'll affect me, as I have citizenship over there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


RE: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - Resentine - 04-13-2015

As a former Resident of the Pacific, And having seen Krull and his minions as the nasty, horrible people they are, I do feel that this would be extremely unfair to people like me, which probably makes up most formers of the NPO. You would Punish us solely because we used to be associated with them? I'm out there, helping Lazarus fight back, and I come check to find this? Yes, of course, there are people like AMOM, Who are the equivalent of devotees, but, that doesn't make up most of us. And punishing us for association with them, will only make more like AMOM, not less.


RE: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - Kris Kringle - 04-13-2015

Resentine: this would impact current citizens of the Pacific, not formers.


RE: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - Ryccia - 04-13-2015

Resign your citizenships over there, I guess? If this ever gets passed.

And I support it, but not too much. This could sour TSP-TP Relations after the Lazarus Coup to the bottom. And I don't wanna see them as our enemies. *Hides*


RE: Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order - Resentine - 04-13-2015

(04-13-2015, 11:31 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: Resentine: this would impact current citizens of the Pacific, not formers.

I'm pretty sure he said "Anyone who was ever involved with the NPO", But, I may be suffering from off-and-on blindness.