[DISCUSSION] Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html) +----- Thread: [DISCUSSION] Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act (/thread-6788.html) |
[DISCUSSION] Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - North Prarie - 01-18-2019 I thought about this because I thought it was unfair that legislators who were taken out of legislatorship during the election because of activity checks, and then immediately reapplied, were not allowed to vote. We could change it to say certain things (May vote if activity check during the election omits them from legislatorship, may vote if previous activity check omitted them from legislatorship, et cetera.) But this is just the basic idea I want to float. Quote: RE: (DISCUSSION) Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - Roavin - 01-18-2019 So, if I understand correctly, you're proposing that if somebody's legislatorship is removed for inactivity while an election is ongoing, and they are readmitted during that election, they can still vote? RE: (DISCUSSION) Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - North Prarie - 01-18-2019 (01-18-2019, 10:59 AM)Roavin Wrote: So, if I understand correctly, you're proposing that if somebody's legislatorship is removed for inactivity while an election is ongoing, and they are readmitted during that election, they can still vote? yes; essentially. RE: (DISCUSSION) Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - Rebeltopia - 01-18-2019 That's a negative from me. Their activity levels deemed that they loose their Legislator status. They dont get the right to vote in an election if they cant take the time to be here the month before elections. (DISCUSSION) Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - sandaoguo - 01-18-2019 I remember back when admins had to do citizenship activity checks and *notify inactive citizens* before removing their citizenship. All that resulted in players being inactive until right before an election. Then they’d come, post enough times to not lose their citizenship, vote, and leave again for 3 months. I very much disfavor anything that holds the hands of inactive members. Elections usually have lots of notices— that’s why people tend to come back during elections and notice they lost status. We shouldn’t be rewarding their inactivity. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: (DISCUSSION) Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - USoVietnam - 01-18-2019 Strongly disagree. This bill will essentially hold the hand for inactive members which will decrease activity level further if they even care. RE: (DISCUSSION) Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - The Sakhalinsk Empire - 01-19-2019 I agree with what Rebs, Glen, and USoV said - simply participating in an election isn't enough to warrant legislatorship; you need to actively participate in debate. RE: (DISCUSSION) Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - Amerion - 01-19-2019 Not to pile on here but for the record, this is what happens with inactive Legislators:
Personally, I believe we have an efficient system with generous leeway afforded to Legislators. If they know that they cannot maintain their activity for any reason whatsoever, they can apply for a Leave of Absence. However, if they still fail the voting requirement despite all the opportunities provided then I would respectfully argue that they are not doing their civic duty as Legislators and do not deserve to partake in the elections. RE: [DISCUSSION] Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - North Prarie - 01-19-2019 Okay. Looks like this idea was only good in my mind |