The South Pacific
[PASSED] Cultural Act - Printable Version

+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html)
+----- Thread: [PASSED] Cultural Act (/thread-7994.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Roavin - 03-20-2020

(03-19-2020, 02:53 PM)Nakari Wrote:
(03-19-2020, 02:48 PM)Seraph Wrote: It's supposed to be triple sec, blue Curacao and lemon and lime soda.

I'm basing this on the pinned post by Glen, where the blue Curacao seems to replace the triple sec?

This is correct, and this is also the version that Nakari, W&S, Birdkeeper, and I had.

[Image: JornQy2.jpg?2]

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Belschaft - 03-20-2020

Doesn't this fall into the category of over-legislation?

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Kris Kringle - 03-22-2020

(03-20-2020, 03:25 PM)Belschaft Wrote: Doesn't this fall into the category of over-legislation?

I was wondering when Belschaft would say that. Tounge

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Belschaft - 03-22-2020

(03-22-2020, 12:12 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote:
(03-20-2020, 03:25 PM)Belschaft Wrote: Doesn't this fall into the category of over-legislation?

I was wondering when Belschaft would say that. Tounge

You should have put money on it.

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Tsunamy - 03-22-2020

(03-20-2020, 03:25 PM)Belschaft Wrote: Doesn't this fall into the category of over-legislation?

I mean ... I don't think this is wrong, but I think it's harmless over-legislation.

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Ryccia - 03-25-2020

I take issue with Articles 2.4, 2.6 and 3.1, as it imposes unnecessary creative restrictions on future MoRAs and their staff.

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Belschaft - 03-27-2020

(03-22-2020, 05:55 PM)Tsunamy Wrote:
(03-20-2020, 03:25 PM)Belschaft Wrote: Doesn't this fall into the category of over-legislation?

I mean ... I don't think this is wrong, but I think it's harmless over-legislation. 

I've never been a fan of legislating things that can be dealt with via common sense. I agree that any harm it causes would be minimal, but that doesn't produce an argument for changing the status quo.

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Amerion - 03-30-2020

(03-27-2020, 03:22 PM)Belschaft Wrote: I've never been a fan of legislating things that can be dealt with via common sense. I agree that any harm it causes would be minimal, but that doesn't produce an argument for changing the status quo.

I don't think it's changing the status quo as much as it is about writing it down.

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Divine Owl - 03-31-2020

It seems that we're all so bored, that we're arguing over the ingredients of a fictional drink...  :p

RE: [DRAFT] Cultural Act - Belschaft - 03-31-2020

(03-30-2020, 04:48 AM)Amerion Wrote:
(03-27-2020, 03:22 PM)Belschaft Wrote: I've never been a fan of legislating things that can be dealt with via common sense. I agree that any harm it causes would be minimal, but that doesn't produce an argument for changing the status quo.

I don't think it's changing the status quo as much as it is about writing it down.

If this law existed three years ago half the stuff it seeks to make permanent wouldn't exist, as we would have written previous standards into law. The status quo is to allow things to naturally evolve and change over time, rather than to freeze everything in place in 2020.