[PASSED] Placement of Voter Restrictions - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html) +----- Thread: [PASSED] Placement of Voter Restrictions (/thread-9987.html) Pages:
1
2
|
[PASSED] Placement of Voter Restrictions - Kris Kringle - 12-12-2021 We currently have a restriction on legislators voting in elections that were ongoing at the time of their admission to the Assembly. This provision is located in Article 2, Section 6 of the Legislator Committee Act, even if it does not have anything to do with the Legislator Committee. I would argue that the Elections Act would be a more logical location for this provision, since anyone looking for regulations on elections and who may vote in them would logically look into the Elections Act. To that effect, I would like to submit the following amendments for consideration:
RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - im_a_waffle1 - 12-13-2021 sounds fine and reasonable, support RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - LFP - 12-13-2021 Considering how long some applications take to be processed by LegComm, how about something along the lines of; (4) To be eligible to vote in a forum-based election, a legislator must have applied to be a legislator before the period for nominations began for that particular election, and has been accepted by the Legislator Committee before the period for voting ends, RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - Kris Kringle - 12-18-2021 I welcome thoughts on the above. RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - Witchcraft and Sorcery - 12-18-2021 So the reason this provision is in place is to prevent undue influence/votestacking/voter importation prior to elections. Sure, with a little pre-planning it makes it easier to disguise, but LegComm knows who the bad actors are and is quite good at smelling bad faith. I am in favor of Kris' proposal though. It seems reasonable and it's absolutely reasonable that this be moved to the Elections Act for the sake of clarity. RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - sandaoguo - 12-20-2021 Is the goal here just to transfer the language? It’s missing the other prong, saying you can’t stand for election either. RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - Kris Kringle - 12-20-2021 (12-20-2021, 12:07 PM)sandaoguo Wrote: Is the goal here just to transfer the language? It’s missing the other prong, saying you can’t stand for election either. I must’ve missed that. Fixed. RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - Kris Kringle - 12-27-2021 Motion to vote. RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - HumanSanity - 12-27-2021 Second RE: Placement of Voter Restrictions - Unkzier - 12-27-2021 Am I allowed to give an opinion? |