We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Judicial Elections Amendment
#58

(05-31-2014, 04:55 AM)Sir Pitt Wrote: Why don't we put an amendment in place that if an election is uncontested (i.e. there is not enough, or exactly enough, candidates to fill the roles) that the appointments are automatic? We can't do without judges, and if people don't like the candidates, they should stand themselves and at least be somewhat constructive, rather than moaning on the sidelines?

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think we have this. The only problem is that if we have two candidates and RON, we end up with a second election.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]


Messages In This Thread
Judicial Elections Amendment - by sandaoguo - 04-22-2014, 04:26 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .