(08-15-2017, 09:40 PM)Farengeto Wrote: While most of these are of a maximum length, the spammer one remains permanent. And for a high influence nation this unappealable ban could still last for several months until their influence decays. My previous thoughts were a bit rushed (I lost around half my original post while writing it), and I jumbled a few comments. When I mention the Delegate and CRS agreeing, under the current form of the Border Control Act they could eject any nation they chose indefinitely as spammers, and as I have said before there is no reasonable means of appealing it.

And you are correct that the recent situation was less than ideal, and I don't dispute the need for greater security powers that would have helped that situation. I think some of these in some form should be added. But the fact it could be repelled even without these increased security powers, and the relatively small consequences if they had succeeded, shows that the situation isn't as drastic as some statements I've seen claim.

I need to know who exactly you're questioning here because either you are saying that the CRS is completely untrustworthy or you don't understand the bill.

Trying to suggest that spammers or trolling deserve the right to appeal simply shows you spend little time on the RMB where spammers and trolls don't know and/or care about our laws.

Beyond that, if the nation is a high endorsement nation the CRS must be consulted. The CRS already has the power to declare a state of emergency, why would we only allow that power *after* a coup?