Revisiting CAIN |
(09-17-2017, 11:21 PM)Tim Wrote: CAIN's backrooms are a bureaucratic nightmare that are a general mix of inactivity, signatories not committing to operations, and the odd spurt of hopeful things happening. Its operations servers have minimal levels of OpSec, and have many documented leaks in the past. As an organization, as fantastically intentioned as it is, it's rather unwieldy and messy these days. Excuse my ignorance, but what are sandcastle servers?
The 16th Delegate of The South Pacific
|
Messages In This Thread |
Revisiting CAIN - by Escade - 09-17-2017, 05:14 PM
Revisiting CAIN - by sandaoguo - 09-17-2017, 09:03 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Griffindor - 09-17-2017, 10:23 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by southern bellz - 09-17-2017, 10:59 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Escade - 09-17-2017, 11:03 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Tim - 09-17-2017, 11:21 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Pronoun - 09-17-2017, 11:23 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by southern bellz - 09-18-2017, 12:51 AM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Tim - 09-18-2017, 01:58 AM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Altmoras - 09-18-2017, 02:24 AM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Seraph - 09-18-2017, 02:55 AM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Roavin - 09-18-2017, 03:31 AM
Revisiting CAIN - by sandaoguo - 09-18-2017, 09:55 AM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Punchwood - 09-18-2017, 01:32 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Drall - 09-18-2017, 05:46 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Belschaft - 09-19-2017, 12:06 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Punchwood - 11-06-2017, 04:47 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Roavin - 11-06-2017, 06:01 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Escade - 11-06-2017, 06:48 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Belschaft - 11-07-2017, 02:09 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Punchwood - 11-07-2017, 02:53 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Roavin - 11-07-2017, 03:17 PM
Revisiting CAIN - by sandaoguo - 11-07-2017, 02:59 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Farengeto - 11-07-2017, 02:59 PM
RE: Revisiting CAIN - by Roavin - 11-09-2017, 02:11 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
3 Guest(s) |