[DISCUSSION] Regional Security |
We are debating and drafting a regional security omnibus package. This thread is the overall management thread for the entire thing, though there are several sub-threads for addressing specific subsets of this larger reform:
[DISCUSSION] Regional Security: Delegate Service Record [DISCUSSION] Regional Security: Naming [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend The Charter [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend Border Control Act [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend Judicial Act [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend Proscription Act [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend Regional Communications Act [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend Regional Officers Act [DRAFT] Regional Security: Amend Criminal Code [DRAFT] Regional Security: New CSI Act [DRAFT] Regional Security: New DC Act [DRAFT] Regional Security: Continuing resolution The current recap of planned changes:
(old post below) Our situation, right now: We have a CRS, which is a bunch of high-endo high-influence nations whose job is to ensure regional security, but have de facto a negligible amount of power in the day to day business to ensure regional security (i.e. upholding the Coalition). Let's approach this logically. The base requirement: The Coalition, as the sovereign and legitimate government of the South Pacific, must ensure its control over the in-game region against detractors. This involves:
These are two completely different things, with different skillsets, currently performed by a single group. I think that's highly problematic. I propose something like following, in rough bullet points:
(I've been talking about this for over a year and a half now, about time I started a thread on it...) ![]() |
Users browsing this thread: |
4 Guest(s) |