(04-28-2020, 05:56 PM)Roavin Wrote: So if I understand this correctly, the complaint is that this deliberation is being held in the region's dedicated deliberative body which is open to anyone including each individual on the Advisory Council, and they would prefer that such deliberations be done in back channels rather than out in the open as part of our liberal democratic processes.

If you're referring to Kringle, no, not at all. It's the subject matter that's the issue; splitting is far too often treated as the only possible and viable solution to an issue that (personally) I see as tangentially related. Splitting MoRA doesn't seem to be the best way to actually solving the issues discussed, so we want to discuss alternatives. We want to consider all of our options with you, the body of the assembly before we go to changing the charter altogether.