We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

A Question and Answer Campaign | ProfessorHenn
#3

(03-15-2015, 11:28 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: Hi!

Could you list the missions that the Special Forces have conducted during your term, and detail what efforts have been made to recruit and train new members?

Foo, memory time!

We've conducted a training mission with Ryccia in An Escape, another, rather secretive training mission with several SPSF members in an expendable region, and assisted TNP in it's Delegatory transition, as well as assisted several liberations like National Socialist Republic and several other, smaller, libs with the people in the "Defender channel"(I'd rather not say, trying to be as unbiased as possible). Possibly a tag or two, but that may have been before my term.

We've sent out a telegram to the region inviting people to join our IRC, #SPSF, but so far, very few have joined with none actually sticking around long enough to even be greeted by me or Raven, and the fact that my bouncer is having problems does not help me in the slightest.

However, we have recruited from within the FP's ranks itself, with Feirmont and Bono joining us on several missions, namely raids. Ryccia also joined us, and did two training missions with me. I consider him to be a soldier, but as a piler mostly, due to his large inability to make update thanks to time zones.

We've also recruited Andre(w), from TSP's allies, to help with us. I will be using Raven's administrative thread a bit more
 in the coming days and weeks, and hope to continue using it in the new term.

We also have several liasons on loan form our allies, Severisen from TEP, Wolf from TNP, and Eluvatar from TNP. All are more than capable to assist, and I will call upon them to help with the SPSF in it's recruit and training. Wolf has offered to write guides.


"Do you support the 75% requirement for the Assembly to pass major decisions, such as on citizenship matters or on amendments?" ~ Dali

For constitutional amendments, 75% is a good requirement. For things that the Cabinet had a say in, 75% is far too much. I feel the only way to handle this would be to either drop those kinds of things to a lower amount, or prevent the Cabinet from voting.

Thank you.


Messages In This Thread
A Question and Answer Campaign | ProfessorHenn - by ProfessorHenn - 03-15-2015, 11:26 PM



Users browsing this thread:
3 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .