We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Second Round of Negotiations on an IARNPT
#25

Clearly we have an issue here.  Every nation so far seems to agree that weapon proliferation must be reduced, but nobody seems to be willing to accept any restriction on their nation's weapons.

Until nations are willing to accept limitations on what weapons they can have, this part of the treaty appears to be going nowhere quickly.  If we can not agree on the elimination of certain types of weapons, can we not at least agree to put an end to their proliferation?  That is the international trade of them?

Is there anybody that does not agree with a ban on the trade of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons?
Reply


Messages In This Thread



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .