Regardless of how the executive is structured after other discussions in the GC, the executive will almost certainly be elected and serve a certain term-length. I think we should talk about whether the four month terms the executive currently serves are beneficial.

I will argue in favor of three month terms. From my perspective, empirically, most Ministers are burnt out by the end of the third month, and those who aren't would generally run for another term anyways. There are few (if any) projects that require the additional month, and if Ministers wish to prioritize a project, they should simply be more careful about picking and choosing what they want to accomplish. Additionally, a three month term introduces more regular accountability to the executive and more timely review of executive actions.