(08-12-2017, 12:00 AM)Atlae Wrote: I also echo Drall's sentiments and want to put the emphasis on 'defiantly.' If one doesn't know the endocap existed, is that violation defiant? (Sure, you can say that ignorance of the law is no excuse, but they're not intentionally breaking the law! >_> )

Is there a procedure to telegram endocap violators to ensure their compliance without ejection/banjection?

If somebody isn't aware of an endorsement cap, or just didn't see that they were over, then that is obviously not a defiant violation. And yes, the CRS does eventually TG people that are over, as they should.