(07-19-2022, 12:47 PM)sandaoguo Wrote: The LC does not “handle roleplay” and you are conveniently ignoring the numerous alternatives that have been offered. Please read over HS’s post.

Also, I do not care if you will personally leave TSP for any reason. Making threats or ultimatums isn’t productive. There will be 1000 other people to fill your shoes who will know nothing about how TSP worked before, so won’t care or feel like they lost anything.

Whilst I may disagree with the tone of both ulies and your responses, I do think both you and ulie raise a number rof points that could be more closely examined.

Ulies following comments should be taken on face value:
Ulie likes the LC
Ulie thinks the LC is doing a good job
Ulie likes that, for what ulies interested in (RP), they're involved.

You rightly state that RP is not in the remit of the LC. That lies, as defined in the current charter, with the Minister for Culture.

What Ulie says to some extent is that they are unaware of the MoCs role in this, or to some extent that the MoC isn't fulfilling that role.

This partially goes to what I was saying with Kringle, that the LC is limited in what it can do by different sections of the charter, and they don't have unfettered control over gameside.

HS's post actually doesn't provide all the options. There is a seventh option.

Retain the LC, amalgamate the Ministry of Culture into and under the LC.

The LC is, as we can see from Ulies post, doing this role and according to them just fine. It would formalise the structure that's happening already.

The LC has already expanded solely from three councillors to include deputies who could take on this responsibility and moving the MoC strengthens the LC and provides for regionwide cultural events available to all.

Edit: it would also reduce the number of ministers thereby potentially leading to more candidates vying fornthe remaining roles instead of just 1 candidate for each role

What are your thoughts on this?