Regardless of interactions, this motion to vote on this proposal will stand open.

---

Three day voting: 1) That in itself is generous given the amount of our legislators; 2) Because it takes a total of 10 days (5 day debate; 5 day vote) to amend a Constitutional law. This makes sense RL. Here, sometimes it should (and now can be) longer for debate, but it mostly discourages interaction; 3) The "Chair's Notice" and "Warning" practice were specifically codified in this bill as for LegComm not to abuse that.

"The Chair can edit the intent" is non-negotiable as it's a complete delusion.

Seconding provides nothing in a system where the Chair has to bring the bill to vote either way and it will still be voted on.