(01-31-2021, 03:44 PM)Roavin Wrote:

(01-31-2021, 02:15 AM)Tsunamy Wrote: For me, the biggest issue remains that by moving this offsite to the people who are "active" in it, we're giving that handful of people active in OWL over the 700+ members of the region. Unlike the rest of the offsite government which most members of the region can choose to ignore, this would have a direct impact on every WA nation in the TSP. 

OWL currently runs on-site, through a dedicated embassy region. Any WA nation in TSP, as well as any non-WA nation certified to being in SPSF, may vote.

While I'm happier than it's on-site, fact remains that through OWL we had 12 nations vote for the proposal currently at a vote in the WA while 290 voted directly to the WA. And, I think that sums up my overriding concern that I don't want the opinion of those 12 to overshadow the 290.

Although, the proposal — as currently suggested — lets the Minister of WA decide how to hold the OWL vote (so it could easily be moved offsite) and doesn't build in the practice anjo described that allows for the delegate to change if the majority of the overall region is going against the initial recommendation.