| Demilitarization |
|
I do not see the point in the SPSF anymore, I think we should have a militia, people can sign up for it knowing that they only need to do anything if it is any emergency. I think that would be much better than the SPSF and we would see many more members.
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member Former Minister of Regional Affairs Former High Court Justice
That's easily implemented under the current legislation. It's not a choice between one or the other.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator ![[Image: B9ytUsy.png]](https://i.imgur.com/B9ytUsy.png)
(01-23-2015, 03:34 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: I still think that supporting the Delegate and helping in allies' transitions should be the only missions of a SPSF-turned Civil Guard. I bet more people would sign up for a Civil Guard, which has a more defined purpose, than to do missions like so far. Then there'd be no need for a MoA. No need for Generals. Just the orders of the Delegate. You'd essentially be removing the SPSF. And this would essentially be EVERY endorser of the Delegate. Ah, the wonders of technology. I'm on Tapatalk!
(01-23-2015, 04:37 PM)Henn Wrote: Then there'd be no need for a MoA. No need for Generals. So? (01-23-2015, 04:37 PM)Henn Wrote: And this would essentially be EVERY endorser of the Delegate. No, it'd be people who actually sign up to be in the Civil Guard. Anyone can endorse the Delegate, but people in the Civil Guard would have a specific mandate to do that, in there interests of regional security, and also to help allied transitions. We have an engaged group of people, we improve awareness on endorsement levels, and can assist our allies. Everybody wins. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
I fail to see how making emotional arguments is relevant to this debate.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Then never mind.
Ah, the wonders of technology. I'm on Tapatalk!
This zero sum nonsense that we can either have a militia or have an army is getting annoying. They are not mutually exclusive.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
It's not that we can't have both, it's that it's a waste of time and resources to have both.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Please explain how having both are a waste.
Ah, the wonders of technology. I'm on Tapatalk! |
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
PREVIOUS ROLES 
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 7 Guest(s) |