Users browsing this thread:

Punchwood · 03-14-2015, 06:03 AM

(03-13-2015, 05:08 PM)Farengeto Wrote: From my understanding, to most people the time since the incident combined with factors such as his regret for the incident and demonstrated willingness to change has made others willing to cautiously welcome him back, while in Belschaft's case many people see the exact opposite.

That's the difference.

Ok then guys lets say a murder killed many people, he was arrested and he made an apology. Because of his apology he didn't spend long in jail and was then set free. That's what's happening here.

Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice

03-14-2015, 08:27 AM

So, because of an act he committed two years ago, he should never be let in again?

Seems to me that TSP wouldn't be about a "second chance" if the parole board revokes parole based on the assembly.

Ah, the wonders of technology. I'm on Tapatalk!

~~Wolf~~ · 03-14-2015, 08:37 AM

(03-14-2015, 08:27 AM)Henn Wrote: Seems to me that TSP wouldn't be about a "second chance" if the parole board revokes parole based on the assembly.

I thought we weren't about second chances anymore, that's why we keep rejecting people from being citizens and throwing members out without a trial. Tounge

On a different note, does the timing of this parole review seem mighty suspicious to anyone else?

***sandaoguo*** · 03-14-2015, 11:38 AM

Wolf, go wear your tin hat elsewhere. I'm getting pretty tired of the whole gadfly act.

The decision to review Milograd's parole was made a while ago.

Todd McCloud · 03-14-2015, 11:53 AM

I am unable to view the link. I assume it's for citizens only.

~~Unibot~~ · 03-14-2015, 02:53 PM

(03-14-2015, 08:37 AM)Wolf Wrote: On a different note, does the timing of this parole review seem mighty suspicious to anyone else?

It was suggested months ago when the revolution in TWP first started and it looked as though Milo had abandoned Lazarus; before this review went to the Assembly it was even suggested by the person who has suggested the review that the review might not be meritable anymore given recent developments - but it was the decision of the parole board that it wouldn't hurt to hold a review anyway.

The delays have to do with the election of a new Chief Justice and Penguin's injuries IRL which interrupted this term; we apologize we couldn't bring the review up sooner.