We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Warzone Annexation and Joining the Coalition
#21

(04-30-2015, 06:01 PM)Elegarth Wrote: but a military take over and occupation of a Warzone is cool, because, I dunno, warzones are less dignified GCRs or something?

Because Warzones were made for the express purpose of being R/D battlegrounds. Yes, I have expressed my opposition to the idea of formally annexing one, but there is nothing wrong or reprehensible about occupying one. Your equivalency does not add up.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
#22

(04-28-2015, 12:01 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: So, a few days ago, the SPSF partook in several raids of Warzone Sandbox with TBR and the EPSA, and yesterday, we have come out on top as the victors.

Simply put, we have colonized the Warzone in the name of the South Pacific, and we hope that it will stay that way. 4 other Warzones agree on our legitimacy.

I'd like to know the Assembly's take on this, as well as entertaining the idea of a new legislation change that includes the ability for other regions to join the Coalition, as Warzone Sandbox has.


ProfessorHenn on Tapatalk.

Kring, I'm referring to THIS opening comment, the bolding is mine. But the discussion was CLEARLY opened as an annexation discussion. Curiously enough, I do agree with your position: occupation is cool, annexation is the same shit Feux did.
You are just a puppet... You have no soul!
[Image: HW5PB6l.jpg]
#23

I think you will see most people have disagreed with any annexation El. This topic is a proposal to see the region's view on whether we do something like that and it seems it doesn't have any real support. Which is fair enough.

Good job anyway. The challenge now is holding onto the delegacy of the region.
#24

(04-30-2015, 06:01 PM)Elegarth Wrote: you are trying to assimilate another region. You are as bad as Feux, but are trying to wash your hands in some made up excuse to feel "dignified", I guess.... A colony is a colony is a colony...

The Warzones were meant to be fought over and anyone is free to set up whatever government they want, however, you'll find that assimilating the region into our government has little to no support here.

#25

I think it'd be a frigging disaster; we could end up going to war over a warzone. What a diplomatic mess. -_-
#26

(04-30-2015, 06:57 PM)Aramanchovia Wrote: I think you will see most people have disagreed with any annexation El. This topic is a proposal to see the region's view on whether we do something like that and it seems it doesn't have any real support. Which is fair enough.

Good job anyway. The challenge now is holding onto the delegacy of the region.

Hear, hear.
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice
#27

Well, since Im the delegate of the region now, how about I make an independent WS government, but loyal to TSP. How about it?
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)

Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)

Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)


#28

Sure.


Jasper Henn




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .