Is it possible to produce mines with this safety catch cheaply? If so, all mines should be required to have such timers.

Darkstrait  :ninja:

Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek

"Hats is very fashion this year."

RP Info

The Socialist Federated Democracy of Darkstrait
Ruled by Archchancellor Ridcully
Member nation of the United Front
[Image: 4ma0p5y.png]

Reply

Is it possible to produce mines with this safety catch cheaply? If so, all mines should be required to have such timers.

As I've stated before, mines don't work that way.

Reply

We are against mines. They not only surprise attack soldiers, they can be a dangerous nuisance in post-war eras, thus leaving civilians injured or maybe even killed.

We support an anti-mine treaty. We also support everyone's nuclear disarmament, including Ryccia, together. We have also banned chemical and biological weapons in our country since the Democratic Revolution, in which these atrocities were used since the 1910's by both the democratic rebels and the ancient Justinian Absolute Monarchy(present-day dynasty: Esonia). We support a ban on chemical and biological weapons.

However, we will not disarm our nukes if everyone has not done so.

Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)

Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)

Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)

Quotes

"The 1% is like a 1% battery charge. It will die out if it is not charged(the charge is the 99%). But if you don't charge it, it will die for sure, sooner or later"
- Me (2001- Present)

"Change is the world's blood"
- Me (2001-Present)

[Image: 9ehfkQV.png]

Reply

Clearly, everything here is a matter of trust and enforcement.


Jasper Henn

Reply

Clearly we have an issue here.  Every nation so far seems to agree that weapon proliferation must be reduced, but nobody seems to be willing to accept any restriction on their nation's weapons.

Until nations are willing to accept limitations on what weapons they can have, this part of the treaty appears to be going nowhere quickly.  If we can not agree on the elimination of certain types of weapons, can we not at least agree to put an end to their proliferation?  That is the international trade of them?

Is there anybody that does not agree with a ban on the trade of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons?

Qvait will accept banning the proliferation of nuclear weapons, but will not agree to banning the proliferation of small arms like assault rifles and handguns.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply