We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Beginning of a New Era- Siberian Districts for Minister of the Army
#21

We have received quite a few complaints about you since your time in the SPSF.

You leaked the password to a region Euro was occupying.

You go into the defender #jump channel when you're raiding, which is against their rules. We've also heard that you leaked information from that channel to raiders. This seriously threatens TSP's ability to defend by alienating those who use that channel.

How do you respond to these complaints?
Reply
#22

Leaking info? This is the first time I've heard this. Isn't this something the region should know? Shouldn't the MoA have addressed this in some way?

Reply
#23

(07-21-2015, 04:51 PM)Sandaoguo Wrote: We have received quite a few complaints about you since your time in the SPSF.

You leaked the password to a region Euro was occupying.

You go into the defender #jump channel when you're raiding, which is against their rules. We've also heard that you leaked information from that channel to raiders. This seriously threatens TSP's ability to defend by alienating those who use that channel.

How do you respond to these complaints?

Leaking the password was during my first few days (first week if I remember correctly) in the SPSF. Not something I'm especially proud of and definitely not one of my finer moments. I'd like to think I've matured and become more accustom to GCR rules and etiquette during my time here.

Now going into #jump has two answers. The one that I'm going to give you, and one that probably shouldn't be said in a campaign thread. They're basically the same thing with different wording though. Here goes!
Going into #jump was a bad idea. I was already in there at the time before I got asked about Op Coop 4, and for some reason didn't leave. I noticed people talking about our operation and figured "Oh why not?" and stuck around to see what would happen and whether or not I should prep more pilers/updaters on the coming updates. It turned out to be a bad idea and now I'm in the middle of a shitstorm during the worst possible time-period possible.
I doubt this will truly alienate us from defenders as I was planning on appointing a liaison to work with defenders anyways, so I would have to have as little contact with defenders as possible as we seem to get in some friendly debates at times. My plan of doing so seems all the more needed now, so I don't expect any major repercussions from this.
SibDis

Reply
#24

The issue with what happened in #jump is that it's literally spying. They haven't made as big a deal out of it as they have the right to.

It does really threaten relations with defenders, because this is a very important channel for them. If even just one soldier causes problems, all of the SPSF could be blacklisted, because they can't trust that we respect the confidentiality of the channel.
Reply
#25

(07-21-2015, 05:22 PM)Sandaoguo Wrote: The issue with what happened in #jump is that it's literally spying. They haven't made as big a deal out of it as they have the right to.

It does really threaten relations with defenders, because this is a very important channel for them. If even just one soldier causes problems, all of the SPSF could be blacklisted, because they can't trust that we respect the confidentiality of the channel.

I view this as Prof. Henn's relationship with other GCR militaries. While it may impact it negatively, we still can work towards relationships successfully (so far).
SibDis

Reply
#26

Congratulations on your appointment
Reply
#27

Thank you! I hope to see you around in the SPSF.
SibDis

Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .