We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Great Council Act of 2015
#61

And I'll still vote against any major, all encompassing charter revision.

While I agree we need judiciary reform, I don't see the need for a GC to do this.

Sent from my LG-D500 using Tapatalk
"...if you're normal, the crowd will accept you. But if you're deranged, the crowd will make you their leader." - Christopher Titus
Deranged in NS since 2011


One and ONLY minion of LadyRebels 
The OUTRAGEOUS CRAZY other half of LadyElysium
#62

Perhaps you should consider approaching each proposal based on its merits, instead Happywide
#63

Contrary to Rebs, my problem is with this resolution, because it gives the impression that one is necessary to convene a Great Council. I am not opposed to the Council itself.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
#64

We should talk about how a Great Council should be called at the Great Council. Tounge
Darkstrait  :ninja:

Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek

"Hats is very fashion this year."

#65

(09-27-2015, 02:02 PM)Darkstrait Wrote: We should talk about how a Great Council should be called at the Great Council. Tounge

We actually should though!
#66

(09-27-2015, 02:39 PM)sandaoguo Wrote:
(09-27-2015, 02:02 PM)Darkstrait Wrote: We should talk about how a Great Council should be called at the Great Council. Tounge

We actually should though!

The Great Council is neither great nor a council. Discuss.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
#67

Call it a Constitutional Free-For-All? Legislative Sandbox? The-Perfect-Place-To-Force-Your-Ideas-Down-Other-People's-Throats? The list thickens.
#68

(09-27-2015, 09:42 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: Call it a Constitutional Free-For-All? Legislative Sandbox? The-Perfect-Place-To-Force-Your-Ideas-Down-Other-People's-Throats? The list thickens.

As the Deputy Chair of the Assembly, I order you to work on your addiction to NationStates. Tounge




#69

This vote has failed 7-9 (43.75%) with 2 abstention(s). 




#70

Then I officially withdraw my call, since I'm not even sure what the calling requirements are now any more.




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .