[WITHDRAWN] AB1906.02: Amendment to Articles one and two: Legislator Committee Act |
(06-13-2019, 05:44 AM)Nakari Wrote: It's hard enough to get three Legislator Committee members, let alone six I don't see the point of needing a separate one for each ministry, if they are going to be only processing the legislator applications and not the applications for the ministries. But if they are going to be processing both the legislator applications and the ministry applications, this either means the Minister has to be a member of the Legislator Committee, or the Minister doesn't get to choose who they accept into their ministry, so I'm not keen on that either. Yes. The LegComm and the ministries should be doing it separately, however, this will allow folks to . apply for legislatorship through ministry applications The problem is with having a generalised application process through one channel is that ministry applications seem to ask extra questions. Generalising the applications may be difficult, unless ministries are willing to communicate, and a LegComm member is willing to direct this. I do endorse it, but it would be a major logistical challenge. Aga/Eunopiar
Mostly does boring things.
I think the issue here is that ministry and legislator applications are two different things with very different requirements. We can centralise their locations and make it easier to get both, but why should legislator applications go through ministry applications?
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
I think the best course of action would be to, in the Legislator Application, provide checkmarks for which ministries one would be interested in, and the LegComm could either forward that info onto the Minister, or point the applicant in the right direction - links/Ministers name/discord ID/etc. If I recall correctly, we used to do this not too long ago... but "not too long ago" could be 5 years to me at this point
"...if you're normal, the crowd will accept you. But if you're deranged, the crowd will make you their leader." - Christopher Titus
Deranged in NS since 2011 One and ONLY minion of LadyRebels The OUTRAGEOUS CRAZY other half of LadyElysium
It was at one point part of the application. I don’t know when it changed either. Or even WHY it changed :-(
This is Penguin!!
Nothing Gold Can Stay Penguins shall one day rule the pie! And by "pie", I mean "World"!! Goddess Empress Queen Princess Lady of TSP Lilium Inter Spinas // Non timebo mala I have done a lot of things in the Region in my History. There's a list somewhere if you wanna go looking.
Primarily it changed because the fellowship program did not keep up to date with the particular requirements and style of each ministry term, to the point where it became misleading rather than helpful.
I think, if we went back to it, we would need to have someone particularly in charge of the fellowship program or single application thread, working with the ministries, to ensure it is up to date and does what those ministries require of it. Founder of the Church of the South Pacific [Forum Thread] [Discord], a safe place to discuss spirituality for people of all faiths and none (currently looking for those interested in prayer and/or "home" groups);
And The Silicon Pens [Discord], a writer's group for the South Pacific and beyond! Yahweo usenneo ir varleo, ihraneo jurlaweo hraseu seu, ir jiweveo arladi. Salma 145:8
(06-13-2019, 11:52 AM)Seraph Wrote: I think, if we went back to it, we would need to have someone particularly in charge of the fellowship program or single application thread, working with the ministries, to ensure it is up to date and does what those ministries require of it. I think that would be quite helpful. A centralised applications centre/thread would be good for involvement. Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
The following 5 users Like Kris Kringle's post:
• Aga, Penguin, Rebeltopia, SG21, The Sakhalinsk Empire
I think this is a cool idea, however, I do like having checkboxes for each ministry on Legislator applications better.
However, it would also be nice to have a checkbox on a Ministry application where if you want to be a legislator as well, a ministry LegComm member could do it for you with the Ministry application, rather than having to go to another thread. Midwesterner. Political nerd. Chipotle enthusiast.
Minister of Culture of the South Pacific // Former Prime Minister
I happen to like it and I would approve if it gets to the voting chamber
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |