or Create an account
  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives Fudgetopia Hall of Government Assembly of the South Pacific [PASSED] Amendment to the Regional Officers Act

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[PASSED] Amendment to the Regional Officers Act
  • Offline Jay Coop
    Captain America impersonator
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       5,142
    Threads:       398
    Rep:       1,508
    Credits: 16,620¢
#11
02-19-2020, 08:28 PM

How does the following sound?

Amendment to Article 2 of the Regional Officers Act Wrote:
Regional Officers Act

...

2. Regional Officers

...

(4) The Council on Regional Security will be allotted a minimum of three Regional Officer positions and granted Border Control and Communications powers.

...

(6) Members of the Council on Regional Security who concurrently serve as another Regional Officer named in this Act shall be granted the powers of both offices. This will not count toward the three Regional Officer positions allotted to the Council on Regional Security.

(7) Where applicable, all unused Regional Officer positions shall be allotted to the Council on Regional Security.

(78) During elections, the Election Commissioner will be granted Communications and Polls powers.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History
(This post was last modified: 02-20-2020, 08:40 PM by Jay Coop.)
  • Offline Farengeto
    Council on Regional Security
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       2,828
    Threads:       229
    Rep:       373
    Credits: 34,980¢
#12
02-20-2020, 08:39 PM

I'd toss a "where applicable" clause or something to that line. Just to avoid legal ambiguities for scenarios where we do have less than 12, since technically those leftover slots need to be given to the CRS, but there might not be remaining CRS members to give it to.

It's mildly pedantic, but better safe than sorry.
  • Offline Jay Coop
    Captain America impersonator
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       5,142
    Threads:       398
    Rep:       1,508
    Credits: 16,620¢
#13
02-20-2020, 08:41 PM

(02-20-2020, 08:39 PM)Farengeto Wrote: I'd toss a "where applicable" clause or something to that line. Just to avoid legal ambiguities for scenarios where we do have less than 12, since technically those leftover slots need to be given to the CRS, but there might not be remaining CRS members to give it to.

It's mildly pedantic, but better safe than sorry.

Done.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History
[-] The following 1 user Likes Jay Coop's post:
  • Seraph
  • Offline Jay Coop
    Captain America impersonator
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       5,142
    Threads:       398
    Rep:       1,508
    Credits: 16,620¢
#14
02-26-2020, 05:18 AM

If there's nothing else to add, I motion to vote on the proposed text above.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History
[-] The following 1 user Likes Jay Coop's post:
  • phoenixofthesun14
  • Offline Belschaft
    Evil Emeritus
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       6,189
    Threads:       132
    Rep:       834
    Credits: 0¢
#15
02-26-2020, 06:34 AM

Happy to second that.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
[Image: B9ytUsy.png]
[+] PREVIOUS ROLES
[-] The following 1 user Likes Belschaft's post:
  • phoenixofthesun14
#16
02-27-2020, 12:45 PM

I am advising Legislators that this is going to vote in the next hour




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives Fudgetopia Hall of Government Assembly of the South Pacific [PASSED] Amendment to the Regional Officers Act


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .