We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[FAILED] CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT - §IV (CREATION OF A PARLIAMENTARIAN)
#11

Just because a few legislators agreed to something over Discord does not equate to having some sort of consensus. There are other legislators like myself who've been preoccupied with other matters to not catch these things over Discord. The fact that three legislators are questioning the utility of this proposal here on the forum is evidence that no such consensus exists.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History
#12

I don't see the need. I think most legislators are capable of construing the potential impacts of a bill for themselves. If the Chair needs someone to advise them on the rules, they can appoint someone, either on a permanent or ad-hoc basis. And literally any legislator can 'suggest edits and clarifications to existing legislation.'

This feels like creating another election for the sake of having one.
[-] The following 2 users Like Bleakfoot's post:
  • Belschaft, Nat
#13

A deputy is not a patronage post. If such a practice has developed then it should stop now. A deputy assists the principal in the discharge of their duties and should be every bit as qualified as the position demands.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
[-] The following 3 users Like Kris Kringle's post:
  • Belschaft, Nat, Rebeltopia
#14

(11-15-2020, 11:42 PM)Jay Coop Wrote: Just because a few legislators agreed to something over Discord does not equate to having some sort of consensus. There are other legislators like myself who've been preoccupied with other matters to not catch these things over Discord. The fact that three legislators are questioning the utility of this proposal here on the forum is evidence that no such consensus exists.

Be that as it may.
DELEGATE MINISTER to the SOUTH PACIFIC
from the FRR OF ADRIATICAN
CULTURE LEAD - NSCW
LEGISLATOR of the ASSEMBLY
#15

(11-16-2020, 09:42 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote: A deputy is not a patronage post. If such a practice has developed then it should stop now. A deputy assists the principal in the discharge of their duties and should be every bit as qualified as the position demands.

In your opinion.
DELEGATE MINISTER to the SOUTH PACIFIC
from the FRR OF ADRIATICAN
CULTURE LEAD - NSCW
LEGISLATOR of the ASSEMBLY
#16

Please quote the relevant conversation from discord here so that all of us can read it.  


Agreeing with Kris - I am not sure whom you are referring to in terms of "special treatment" but that isn't the case. Deputies have been appointed by the Minister or Chair for ages and unless I am grossly mistaken, there hasn't been any issues.
This is Penguin!!
Nothing Gold Can Stay
Penguins shall one day rule the pie!
And by "pie", I mean "World"!!
Goddess Empress Queen Princess Lady of TSP 
Lilium Inter Spinas // Non timebo mala
I have done a lot of things in the Region in my History.
There's a list somewhere if you wanna go looking. 
#17

(11-16-2020, 01:30 PM)Penguin Wrote: Please quote the relevant conversation from discord here so that all of us can read it.
This is the link to that conversation if you want to read it on Discord.
#18

(11-16-2020, 12:42 PM)Delegate Vanderpool Wrote: Be that as it may.

(11-16-2020, 12:43 PM)Delegate Vanderpool Wrote: In your opinion.

To be honest I find this attitude quite offputting. If that's how the rest of this debate is going to go we might as well motion, second and get over with the vote.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
[-] The following 4 users Like Kris Kringle's post:
  • Belschaft, Jay Coop, Rebeltopia, Somyrion
#19

(11-16-2020, 03:09 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:
(11-16-2020, 12:42 PM)Delegate Vanderpool Wrote: Be that as it may.
 
(11-16-2020, 12:43 PM)Delegate Vanderpool Wrote: In your opinion.

To be honest I find this attitude quite offputting. If that's how the rest of this debate is going to go we might as well motion, second and get over with the vote.

It's always a sign of great things to come when someone who joined the Assembly a month ago acts in a manner like this.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator

[Image: B9ytUsy.png]
#20

(11-16-2020, 03:59 PM)Belschaft Wrote:
(11-16-2020, 03:09 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:
(11-16-2020, 12:42 PM)Delegate Vanderpool Wrote: Be that as it may.
 
(11-16-2020, 12:43 PM)Delegate Vanderpool Wrote: In your opinion.

To be honest I find this attitude quite offputting. If that's how the rest of this debate is going to go we might as well motion, second and get over with the vote.

It's always a sign of great things to come when someone who joined the Assembly a month ago acts in a manner like this.

You're right, but, just ignore it. Not really necessary to reply like that. Kris started off right, but the rest of it is just passive aggressive nonsense.

Vandy, you shouldn't be curt and give zero substance replies because others disagree with you or dislike the proposal/discussion. If you don't like it, ignore it or actually engage in debate.




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .