The Aurora Alliance, TNP-TSP Treaty Amendment. |
Honoured Chairman and Members of the Assembly,
The North and South Pacific's have concluded our negotiations on an updated treaty between our two regions. The final draft, signed by the Delegate of the North Pacific, r3naissanc3r as well as both Tsunamy and myself on behalf of the South Pacific is now awaiting your vote. I would like to introduce this as an Amendment to the existing treaty, which shall replace its current content. I believe that a 60% threshold is required for this amendment to pass. Without further ado: Quote:
This is fairly straightforward and similar in language to our modern treaties with Lazarus and The Rejected Realms. I have no significant objections.
I will have to consult with Unibot, but I believe we would be able to hold a joint vote on repealing the old treaty and ratifying this new one. The threshold is 60% for both actions, so it shouldn't be impossible to hold a single vote to do both at the same time.
Full support! The new treaty is a vast improvement over the old one.
Just to clarify, there is no "amendment" function for treaties - so currently we'll have to have a vote that repeals the old treaty and replaces it with the new one. We can do so altogether as one vote with a 60% margin needed for support (since the margins are the same). Virtually, this acts in practice like an amendment.
Considering we have a long held treaty with TNP, this is only flushing out some of the details.
I think it's a great refresher for our relations and I look forward to continued work with TNP.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Since the proposal itself provides for the repeal of the previous one, I think one vote would suffice.
Other than the title, which I cannot bring myself to like or even tolerate, this proposal seems fairly reasonable and well drafted. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
I like this, and I'm looking forward to passing it.
I have no objections!
Formerly Relevant, Currently Former.
I'm disappointed there's nothing for me to complain about
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member Former Minister of Regional Affairs Former High Court Justice
I object to the fact that TNP is listed first and not TSP. Why did TSP's duly elected representatives not fight for a better placement?
(01-01-2015, 05:18 PM)Sandaoguo Wrote: I object to the fact that TNP is listed first and not TSP. Why did TSP's duly elected representatives not fight for a better placement? Ya know -- I thought about that. But I figured alphabetical order would work. When we have an alliance with the TWP, we can be first
-tsunamy
[forum admin] |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |