We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Philosophical Question: What would you change about the world?
#71

(04-23-2015, 03:14 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: Yeah, having a little bit of both is good in a person. If it's entirely one end, then you will be viewed as a radical, by both sides.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

* Bonaugure nods.

Indeed.

"Find a way or make one."

Better known as Bon.
#72

(04-23-2015, 03:36 PM)Bonaugure Wrote:
(04-23-2015, 03:14 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: Yeah, having a little bit of both is good in a person. If it's entirely one end, then you will be viewed as a radical, by both sides.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

* Bonaugure nods.

Indeed.

Yeah. I mean, look at the money-mad investors that drove the US into both the Great Depression and the more recent 2008 recession. But on the other hand, look at Stalin and Mao. Both of them were whackjobs, when you look at some of the crazy stuff they did.
But find a middle ground between the endless competition of capitalism and the brutally country-oriented communist autocracies, and you have democratic socialism, an excellent compromise that balances the high points of both extremes.
Darkstrait  :ninja:

Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek

"Hats is very fashion this year."

#73

(04-23-2015, 05:29 PM)Darkstrait Wrote:
(04-23-2015, 03:36 PM)Bonaugure Wrote:
(04-23-2015, 03:14 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: Yeah, having a little bit of both is good in a person. If it's entirely one end, then you will be viewed as a radical, by both sides.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

* Bonaugure nods.

Indeed.

Yeah. I mean, look at the money-mad investors that drove the US into both the Great Depression and the more recent 2008 recession. But on the other hand, look at Stalin and Mao. Both of them were whackjobs, when you look at some of the crazy stuff they did.
But find a middle ground between the endless competition of capitalism and the brutally country-oriented communist autocracies, and you have democratic socialism, an excellent compromise that balances the high points of both extremes.
And how is this? I know a little bit of socialism, but I don't know about democratic socialism.
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)

Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)

Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)


#74

Let's take it to the socialism vs capitalism thread before Kris gets mad.
I'll answer there.
Darkstrait  :ninja:

Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek

"Hats is very fashion this year."

#75

(04-23-2015, 06:23 PM)Ryccia Wrote:
(04-23-2015, 05:29 PM)Darkstrait Wrote:
(04-23-2015, 03:36 PM)Bonaugure Wrote:
(04-23-2015, 03:14 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: Yeah, having a little bit of both is good in a person. If it's entirely one end, then you will be viewed as a radical, by both sides.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

* Bonaugure nods.

Indeed.

Yeah. I mean, look at the money-mad investors that drove the US into both the Great Depression and the more recent 2008 recession. But on the other hand, look at Stalin and Mao. Both of them were whackjobs, when you look at some of the crazy stuff they did.
But find a middle ground between the endless competition of capitalism and the brutally country-oriented communist autocracies, and you have democratic socialism, an excellent compromise that balances the high points of both extremes.
And how is this? I know a little bit of socialism, but I don't know about democratic socialism.

It's a mixed system. Thus, it has plenty of variants according of what the nation's authorities consider proper for it.

It can have capitalist or Socialist tendencies... Or be right in the middle, which is rare.

"Find a way or make one."

Better known as Bon.
#76

What would I change? I would change human beings from the dominant species to non-existent. I think it would be best for all organisms involved. Smile
Democratic Donkeys
AKA Democatic Donkeys
AKA "DD"

Senior Diplomat to The South Pacific
Security Councilor of The North Pacific
#77

Yeah, but then, some other creature would be dominant.


~Professor Henn, Hardcore Leftist, Totally not a Dinosaur
#78

End all uses of energy that causes carbon emissions, therefore stopping man-made global warming.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .