[DRAFT] Electioneering Amendments |
Given the recent nonsense with foreigners posting on our RMB about the Delegate election, and the discussions about it on the NS Gameplay Discord (clearly in favor of one candidate over the other), I'm proposing the following amendments related to electioneering in TSP elections. Our elections should be free from foreign meddling, and they should be conducted in fair and honest ways.
Amendment to the Elections Act Wrote:8. Electioneering Activities Amendment to Article 1 of the Criminal Code Wrote:1. Crimes
The following 4 users Like sandaoguo's post:
• New Haudenosaunee Confederacy, North Prarie, Ryccia, Seraph
(07-14-2018, 05:38 PM)Nakari Wrote: Discord PMs (or PMs anywhere really) should be held to the same standards as forum PMs. Lord knows people spam with them I thought about this, but I think Discord Admins should need to consent to adding that here. We haven't usually regulated off-site chats in our laws.
I think that as long as we're still allowing for manually sent widespread campaigning across the NS and Forum platforms, which is a more than commonplace way to campaign, I don't have too many issues with this. Forbidding script and stamp usage is a good way to level the playing field, as it ensures that nobody is disenfranchised for lacking access to funds or scripts.
There is the matter of this specifically only allowing individually-sent telegrams which I'm a bit mixed on. Nationstates allows for any player to send up-to eight telegrams at a time, so I don't think we should really be forbidding a manually-accessible free resource. On the flip, I'm really into the mentality of "If you want to campaign, you should put on your campaign shoes and knock on those doors one at a time". I think I'm tentatively in support of it, but don't feel too strongly one way or another. Regarding foreign interference, I'm kind of surprised we didn't have any provisions for this prior. I think we had an eerie amount of embassy cross-posting today regarding the election. If folks want to be involved in our election, they should genuinely get involved in our region as actively-participating citizens. I assume this wouldn't be affecting people with multiple citizenships though, right? We have a lot of folks like that, and I wouldn't want to suddenly see a huge part of the region suddenly accused of unlawful actions.
That provision only affects cross-posting and people who come to TSP for the purpose of electioneering. It wouldn’t apply to TSPers who are here in good faith.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm somewhat indifferent to the TGing stuff, but can we include a line that says people can't use RO powers for election purposes? Certainly the TG bit would stop most of the communication powers, but there are certainly other ways the powers could be abused.
-tsunamy
[forum admin] (07-14-2018, 09:35 PM)Tsunamy Wrote: I'm somewhat indifferent to the TGing stuff, but can we include a line that says people can't use RO powers for election purposes? Certainly the TG bit would stop most of the communication powers, but there are certainly other ways the powers could be abused. I agree with this, RO powers should not be used for election related purposes. I also agree with preventing the use of scripts although perhaps there should be some better tracking of scripts? I think the use of manual TGing (whether individual or the game allowed 8) should be allowed and is fine. Escade ~ Positions Held in TSP ~ Delegate | Vice Delegate Minister of Regional Affairs, | Minister of Foreign Affairs | Minister of Military Affairs ~ The Sparkly One ~ My Pinterest
(07-14-2018, 09:35 PM)Tsunamy Wrote: I'm somewhat indifferent to the TGing stuff, but can we include a line that says people can't use RO powers for election purposes? Certainly the TG bit would stop most of the communication powers, but there are certainly other ways the powers could be abused. I’ll definitely add this. It’s probably something we would ban under the last part of the RO Act, but it makes a lot of sense to do it explicitly here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk (07-15-2018, 12:25 AM)Escade Wrote: I also agree with preventing the use of scripts although perhaps there should be some better tracking of scripts? There's no real way we can track people scripting outside of an honor system, but the game kind of does it for us. If you're sending over the API, you need to tag the telegram as an API telegram, and it will come up for those receiving it as an API Template. Beyond that, Administration has ruled that it is completely illegal to manipulate the telegram sending, the telegram interface, or anything of that sort, whether it be through hotkeys, automation, or anything else. Anyone scripting outside of the API parameters in regards to telegrams would be breaking not just our rules but the game's rules. (07-15-2018, 12:32 PM)Tim Wrote:(07-15-2018, 12:25 AM)Escade Wrote: I also agree with preventing the use of scripts although perhaps there should be some better tracking of scripts? I mean how do you punish someone if you can't keep track is what I'm wondering? Like NHC, on Discord, stated that he used a script to target voters. It wasn't malicious in any way but it seems like the kind of thing people don't want. Therefore, I'm wondering how people will check and make sure no one breaks the rule. Escade ~ Positions Held in TSP ~ Delegate | Vice Delegate Minister of Regional Affairs, | Minister of Foreign Affairs | Minister of Military Affairs ~ The Sparkly One ~ My Pinterest (07-15-2018, 07:37 PM)Escade Wrote:(07-15-2018, 12:32 PM)Tim Wrote:(07-15-2018, 12:25 AM)Escade Wrote: I also agree with preventing the use of scripts although perhaps there should be some better tracking of scripts? Scripted telegrams have to be written via an API template, I believe, which should then show tag:api in the telegram when it arrives to a voter. Then all you really need is one telegram as proof that it's occurring, no? @Roavin or @Somyrion might be able to speak accurately on the topic matter, as I could very well be wrong about how scripting TGs works. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |