Vote is here, apologies for the delay:

http://thesouthpacific.x10.mx/thread-2415.html

(04-27-2015, 11:18 PM)Unibot Wrote: Has the cabinet or the CSS declared the NPO Senate, 'hostile' to TSP? I believe that is required for the use of Article 7.

That is actually a good point. While individual members of both have posted here, I don't think we've had a recommendation at the institutional level.

I would like to say now that we should be making the NPO Senate a prohibited group, not the NPO as a whole. I've had multiple interactions with WA Citizens, and they're simply brainwashed people.


ProfessorHenn on Tapatalk.

This vote passed 16-3.

By my reading of Article 7, I do think the CSS/Cabinet is meant to declare a group hostile to the Assembly, before it can become official. It doesn't technically say this declaration has to occur prior to any vote. As a declaration hasn't happened yet, I will hold off on updating the list of prohibited groups in the CoL.

Again, a lot of it can be argued as coming down to interpretation, as the word "may" is used a fair bit. If anyone disagrees with any of this, please speak up.

I'm guessing once the declaration is out, I'll be losing my citizenship then?

You would have to seven-day grace period to decide which citizenship to keep.

I will not make a choice. My choice was made YEARS ago when I decided to be a citizen of ALL the feeders. Don't try to put this on me. TSP will be taken to history by your decision. Your wrong decision, Kring. Is sad to see that a feeder who claims not to support the behavior that the NPO had behaves as badly as NPO did.

Let's set the record straight:

1. I did not make this decision. The Assembly of the South Pacific decided to do this, as is its right.
2. The New Pacific Order manipulated Lazarus and attempted to install a rogue regime under its tutelage. Lazarus is a treaty ally of the South Pacific.
3. The New Pacific Order has a record of such behaviour, some of its officials having supported the 2013 Milograd Coup. The Assembly deemed this line of behaviour to be detrimental to the security of the South Pacific.

I think my fellow citizens will join me in arguing that there is no scenario in which securing our region is on the same level as attempting to colonise a Game Created Region, let alone one with which we are allied. You are every right to have an opinion regarding the New Pacific Order, Elegarth, but it is not appropriate for you to equate the legitimate actions of this Assembly to what the Pacific has done, especially since its first actions after losing were not to show repentance over the act itself, but rather over the fact that it failed.

But you know, I do agree with you in one aspect. The South Pacific will be taken to history, as a region that is protecting itself and taking a stand against the expansionism of the Pacific. It can have all the inactive authoritarianism it wants, but we want none of it on our shores.

(05-05-2015, 04:49 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: But you know, I do agree with you in one aspect. The South Pacific will be taken to history, as a region that is protecting itself and taking a stand against the expansionism of the Pacific. It can have all the inactive authoritarianism it wants, but we want none of it on our shores.

Lo siento pero no hermano. TSP va a pasar a la historia como el hazmereir de los feeders.

I'm sorry but not brother, TSP is going to go into history as the most laughable of feeders

It is a sad day for the feederite world.

Empty propaganda is more at home in The Pacific.