[FAILED] World Assembly reform - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html) +----- Thread: [FAILED] World Assembly reform (/thread-9149.html) |
RE: [AT VOTE] World Assembly reform - sandaoguo - 02-07-2021 Based on the illuminating discussion yesterday, I do not believe this should be a Cabinet ministry. I do support formalizing OWL as either an institution in its own right or within the office of the Prime Minister. But I don’t believe there is considerable merit to OWL being a dedicated Cabinet ministry, given the lack of actual policy making in its nature. RE: [AT VOTE] World Assembly reform - Stickmin - 02-07-2021 Even though I'm in OWl, I just don't see why we would need this, it seems fine just the way it is, I mean I like what it does, it shows what a part of TSP thinks of a certain bill. To change it to be this secondary delegate just seems weird, so I'm against it I guess. RE: [AT VOTE] World Assembly reform - Purple Hyacinth - 02-12-2021 This has failed. |