(01-14-2020, 04:29 PM)Ski Slopes of Agalaesia Wrote: I think a TSP executive server would only be useful, but, some concerns:

1) FA and MA hold many channels, and the overall channel count in the end may exceed 50. They also possess secretive channels and logs.

If we take the TNP approach, anyone just joining the server won't have immediate access to all of the channels nor will they see the categories for every ministry. As for secretive channels, we can still modify their permissions so that only a qualified few may see them.

(01-14-2020, 04:29 PM)Ski Slopes of Agalaesia Wrote: 2) I believe all of the ministers should be granted admin roles, because, while waiting for the administration to discuss creating channels in the main server is ok, waiting for the admin to do everything, including changing channel descriptions, names, create new channels on server which is used by a ministry that you manage would be a pain in the rear.

I think we'll be able to grant those powers on a category by category basis, but I'm not 100% sure about that.

(01-14-2020, 04:29 PM)Ski Slopes of Agalaesia Wrote: 3) It is the cabinet's pejorative to create such a server. If the legislators force the MoRA departments to breed in captivity to create children who can pay their pensions when they retire, then I can understand the need for such a server. However, I'm quite sure that the cabinet is quite happy with their own servers.

It may just as well be that the Cabinet is happy with having their own servers, but this could make it harder for new members of the region to learn about the existence of these servers. If the Cabinet expansion proposal is passed, we will have anywhere between four to six ministries, which may necessitate having them all in one place.