(05-02-2020, 12:26 PM)Omega Wrote: I think my biggest fear with the Qwert's proposal is it doesn't provide a solution to the imbalance in the cabinet ministers. That is probably my biggest hesitation at this point.

The work load for the minister would (hopefully) decrease. My suggestion could also be adapted and include any number of ministries.

(05-02-2020, 12:36 PM)Tsunamy Wrote: but the institutional memory and all of the Advisory Board and Fellows gets shifted to be more permanent?

Yes, that's what I was thinking.

(05-02-2020, 12:36 PM)Tsunamy Wrote: I think I would allow either the PM or Cabinet at least to appoint and dismiss the heads of the utilities, but otherwise, these seems great?

Perhaps the first time manning the positions, then I think the utilities themselves should be doing this independently (but probably there should be a law giving the PM or cabinet the authority to do so, should it be needed for some reason).

(05-02-2020, 12:36 PM)USoVietnam Wrote: I would like an explanation on why MoFA should handle events and SPSF should handle SWAN considering both institutions have no expertise in such areas.

The reason why I put events also under MoFA is that it may want to host/arrange festivities involving other regions, and then it could request work to be done from the utilities, just like the new MoRA equivalent. I put Swan under the Ministry of Defence because I think of it as something that enhances the defence of the region. (But like I said, ignore the other ministries in the illustration, the point in including them is to illustrate that they too can use the utilities).