We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[PASSED] Regional Officers Act ambiguity
#1

Quote:2. Regional Officers

(2) The Prime Minister will be granted all non-Border Control powers.

(3) The remaining Cabinet ministers will be allotted between one and four up to three Regional Officer positions and granted Appearance, Communications, and Polls powers. They will decide which Cabinet ministers among them will be granted Embassies power.

Fairly self-explanatory. Clause is ambiguous about whether it includes PM.

From internal discussions amongst the Cabinets and CRS, most of us seemed to agree five Cabinet ROs were too many (we were leaning only assigning half that) so I've gone for the interpretation where there are between 1 to 4 total Cabinet RO, including the PM.
[-] The following 2 users Like Farengeto's post:
  • Seraph, Somyrion


Messages In This Thread
[PASSED] Regional Officers Act ambiguity - by Farengeto - 10-20-2020, 10:06 PM
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - by Domais - 10-21-2020, 12:54 AM
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - by Roavin - 10-21-2020, 04:15 AM
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - by Jay Coop - 11-20-2020, 10:54 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .