+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html)
+----- Thread: [PASSED] Regional Officers Act ambiguity (/thread-8880.html)
[PASSED] Regional Officers Act ambiguity - Farengeto - 10-20-2020
Quote:2. Regional Officers
(2) The Prime Minister will be granted all non-Border Control powers.
(3) The remaining Cabinet ministers will be allotted between one and four up to three Regional Officer positions and granted Appearance, Communications, and Polls powers. They will decide which Cabinet ministers among them will be granted Embassies power.
Fairly self-explanatory. Clause is ambiguous about whether it includes PM.
From internal discussions amongst the Cabinets and CRS, most of us seemed to agree five Cabinet ROs were too many (we were leaning only assigning half that) so I've gone for the interpretation where there are between 1 to 4 total Cabinet RO, including the PM.
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - Domais - 10-21-2020
All of the Cabinet ministers should be granted RO positions if there is space.
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - Roavin - 10-21-2020
(10-21-2020, 12:54 AM)Domais Wrote: All of the Cabinet ministers should be granted RO positions if there is space.
I recommend reading the discussion thread from when we changed this.
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - Jay Coop - 11-20-2020
I motion to vote on this bill.
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - Farengeto - 11-21-2020
Second
RE: Regional Officers Act ambiguity - Purple Hyacinth - 11-21-2020
This has been brought to a vote here.
RE: [AT VOTE] Regional Officers Act ambiguity - Purple Hyacinth - 11-24-2020
This has passed.