Head Justice,
Officer of the INL.
honorable colleagues,

what is happening right now, is something the World Forum should have prevented. Sadly this organisation has failed in that regard.
Now a case is brought up against nations, who really took the endangerment of human rights and international security seriously. That some countries, like the Federal Republic of GI-Land e.g., now say, the nations should have waited for the WF, they should have only gone into the conflict with a WF mandate, is not understandable to us.
The World Forum is that: a forum. Most agreements we have created in this organisation are voluntary to abide to. 
Now the Assembly wants us to judge members, who did make use of that provision. Is that correct?

This is, what we will look for during our debate and examination of the case. How much power does the World Forum really have? And how is this power distributed between the member nations, the Assembly and the International Court? This case will be a precedent and I call for all of us, to go into the debate with open minds and not with a lean towards one or the other outcome. If we find out, that the WF has the power to bind nations to certain agreements, we of course need to administer justice and "punish", for a lack of a better word, the defendants. If we find out however, the WF does not have that power, the Assembly can of course try to change the important resolutions or even the Charter to give that power to the organisation, but it would prevent us to punish the defendants, because they only made use of their rights they have.

Thank you.

Vato Cerrorr
Judge at the International Court for the Republic of Snolland