Preliminary Discussion: Cabinet Order on Delegate elections |
Hello all,
I just filed a Legal Question about a scenario where there is only one candidate for office as Delegate, a scenario which may become applicable given only one candidate has currently declared. If the Court rules that there is no existing procedure for elections under this scenario, it will likely fall on us (as the Cabinet) to enact an executive order pursuant to Article VI(16) of the Charter. Several intervening factors (an alternate Court ruling or an additional candidate declaring for office) would avert such a scenario, but I believe it is pertinent to begin discussion, including what executive order the Cabinet would issue on this matter. I have a few thoughts but will start by opening up the floor for others to give their ideas Minister of Foreign Affairs
General of the South Pacific Special Forces Ambassador to Balder Former Prime Minister and Minister of Defense
I do have thoughts, but I will keep these to myself for now depending on how the case assignment in Court goes. I'll keep you updated.
Glen's candidacy makes this thread moot because resolving this issue will no longer be an urgent question/on a fast timeline, thus any change to the law should go through the normal Assembly legislative process.
Minister of Foreign Affairs
General of the South Pacific Special Forces Ambassador to Balder Former Prime Minister and Minister of Defense
Glen's candidacy not being valid due to never posting a campaign thread or conflict of interest declaration means this thread is suddenly relevant again. I will try to post a draft executive order before bed but others can put their thoughts here as well
Minister of Foreign Affairs
General of the South Pacific Special Forces Ambassador to Balder Former Prime Minister and Minister of Defense
(2) On the first of every January and July, the Assembly will convene for the first round of Delegate elections. Here's a draft -- open to input. As a note, this requires unanimous Cabinet approval. Minister of Foreign Affairs
General of the South Pacific Special Forces Ambassador to Balder Former Prime Minister and Minister of Defense
Sounds good to me.
"After he realizes this newfound power of his to override the hopes and dreams of republicans, he puts all of the united provinces under his control."
one time minister of culture
"will initiate a second round of voting conducted via a week-long poll of Native World Assembly members"
This should probably mention that the options in the gameside poll are the candidate + RON.
(01-07-2022, 10:41 PM)Purple Hyacinth Wrote: "will initiate a second round of voting conducted via a week-long poll of Native World Assembly members" How do you like that? Minister of Foreign Affairs
General of the South Pacific Special Forces Ambassador to Balder Former Prime Minister and Minister of Defense
Looks good to me now!
I'm not assigned to the case, so I can speak freely.
Before I even read HS' draft, my thoughts: Charter VI.16 says that "Executive orders may only be issued to address an immediate and pressing issue created by ambiguity or holes in a particular law". That says to me that we shouldn't try to legislate from our position, but rather that we should apply a modest fix in the least disruptive way possible that is in the spirit of the law otherwise. Least disruptive at this time means we should do it such that the forum-side vote with just one candidate and RON is permissible, since that election is already running. Furthermore, we can not infringe upon Charter-granted rights, and Charter VII.6 explicitly states that the game-side community must be involved in the process. Ergo, we must do it in a way that leads to an on-site election. If voting wasn't already going, I would have proposed that only one declared candidate leads to a reopening of nominations, but we're past that and imposing new nominations now would be more disruptive than not. Ergo, the only remaining viable solution is to have the on-site community vote on whether they approve of Penguin or not. If that's a majority approval vote or by FPTP with the virtual RON candidate is mechanically the same, though the latter is in line with the rest of the Elections Act, so it should be that. Now, let me take a look at HS' legislative draft .... Okay, the HS draft is pretty much that. It's more verbose than it needs to be, but doing it in a nicer way would also touch other sections, so I think the actual legislative change is fine as written. I've whipped up a draft for the order itself. Probably not the best preambulatory thingies. Quote:The Cabinet of the South Pacific, Something like that. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |