| Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order |
|
So, I hate to be the one to point out the elephant in the room but, ah, if Elegarth is still a citizen of the NPO, and we just made the NPO a prohibited group, shouldn't his citizen masking be removed now?
Well, there is still the issue of whether or not the proper procedure was followed. I don't know if the CSS has to issue some kind of statement before we can make this official and even then, we may have to hold another vote just to make sure it can't be deemed illegal because the proper procedure may not have been followed.
The last time this was used was the war declarations against Gatesville and GGR.
While I'm not making an official judicial ruling, reading the article I do not currently see any contradiction or procedure errors. The only requirement is that the CSS/cabinet requests it, and there is a report on their hostility.
Article 7: Prohibited Regions and Organizations 1. The Cabinet and/or Committee for State Security (C SS) may request the Assembly designate foreign regions and organizations deemed hostile to The South Pacific as Prohibited Groups. Such requests must be accompanied with a report detailing those activities that meet the definitions of hostility detailed in clause 2 of this Article.
Hm. I thought the CSS had posted its statement. I'll get it up in a bit.
(05-10-2015, 10:24 PM)Wolf Wrote: So, I hate to be the one to point out the elephant in the room but, ah, if Elegarth is still a citizen of the NPO, and we just made the NPO a prohibited group, shouldn't his citizen masking be removed now? For the records, since I was always quite open with TSP, I'm still masked, dudes... You are just a puppet... You have no soul!
![[Image: HW5PB6l.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/HW5PB6l.jpg)
So, with the CSS's statement and the vote, this should be in effect when Far takes up CoA.
|
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
I am a Super Villain
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |