We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Criminal Charges
#21

What about how this case has been mishandled? You completely circumvented the system and then worked backwards through the system.

#22

1. Farengeto brought this case, not me.

2. You recused yourself, did you not?

3. Most importantly, at the end of the day, you made a mistake. There is no defending the mistake that was made. All of this could have been avoided by admitting the court made a mistake and forgot to have a non-presiding Justice. But you guys freaked out and refused to admit any wrongdoing, so now we're in a legitimate constitutional crisis.

You can argue all you want about who made the info public and whether that was right or wrong. But you made a mistake and Apad made a mistake. And both of you were more concerned about saving face and picking fights in an unrelated issue, that you've wound up creating a big scandal.
#23

No, YOU made this when you and Kris decided that you were above the system.

#24

What?
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)

Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)

Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)


#25

(08-01-2015, 09:35 PM)Ryccia Wrote: What?

Arbiter08 Wrote:If it was an Admin then it sets a dangerous precedent of allowing the admins to abuse their access to certain private areas of the forum to further a political agenda (which also compromised the non-political nature of the admin team.

(08-01-2015, 12:25 AM)TAC Saxton Wrote: I'll be as direct as possible here. The six people that have access are the Justices me, Hopolis, Apad and the admins, Kris, Tsu and GR. Knowing this and knowing that me,Apad and Hopolis are all on the same page, that leaves the admins. Kris submitted HCLQ1515, GR has been supporting Kris from the start and Tsu called BS on this some time ago, which leads me to believe that Kris and GR abused their powers as admins to monitor private deliberations on a case they have personal interest in. There's clearly a conflict of interest and I demand the charges be dismissed.
Now you're up-to-date.

#26

Quite frankly I'm appalled at the behaviour of our chief Justice here, not only have they failed to maintain order in this discussion, but they have escalated the chaos.

The ethics of my anonymous sources information has no impact on this case, the evidence still exists and we have no laws regarding "illegal evidence" regardless.
Their identities are irrelevant to this case, and as stated previously I will not reveal them.
Any alleged political motivations do not change the validity of the case, nor do I as the sole filer of this case do I possess any other than emsuring the integrity of our legal system.

Please remember what this complaint is about and do not try and twist my case with irrelevant subjects. Unless you are disputing or confirming Apad's prior bias in this case please do not post further and if our Chief Justice will not enforce order then I demand that someone else do it. This is a court, not an unmoderated assembly thread
#27

I must also reiterate my demand that Hopolis recuse themselves in this case.
#28

(08-01-2015, 10:43 PM)Farengeto Wrote: I must also reiterate my demand that Hopolis recuse themselves in this case.

Do you have other members you'd care to appoint? Or are we going to hold this case without a judge as well as without evidence?
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
#29

(08-03-2015, 02:35 PM)Tsunamy Wrote:
(08-01-2015, 10:43 PM)Farengeto Wrote: I must also reiterate my demand that Hopolis recuse themselves in this case.

Do you have other members you'd care to appoint? Or are we going to hold this case without a judge as well as without evidence?
This has nothing to do with them. I don't care who's judging, both of them were involved in the case that involve these charges and thus possess a CoI. Criticize me as you will for the reactions of the court in regards to this controversy, but I stand by my charges which are still for Apad and Apad alone.
#30

(08-03-2015, 04:21 PM)Farengeto Wrote:
(08-03-2015, 02:35 PM)Tsunamy Wrote:
(08-01-2015, 10:43 PM)Farengeto Wrote: I must also reiterate my demand that Hopolis recuse themselves in this case.

Do you have other members you'd care to appoint? Or are we going to hold this case without a judge as well as without evidence?
This has nothing to do with them. I don't care who's judging, both of them were involved in the case that involve these charges and thus possess a CoI. Criticize me as you will for the reactions of the court in regards to this controversy, but I stand by my charges which are still for Apad and Apad alone.

No, but you demanded they recuse themselves so I'm wondering who, exactly, you think is going to hear this case?
-tsunamy
[forum admin]




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .