Poll: Should the Great Council adopt this resolution of procedures? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Aye | 5 | 71.43% | |
Nay | 2 | 28.57% | |
Total | 7 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Adoption of Procedures |
The following procedure resolution is up for vote. Voting ends at 3:00pm EDT on Monday, October 12.
Quote:Procedures of the Second Great Council of 2015 ----------- As set forth in the Great Council Organizing Act, we must first adopt a timeline, procedures, and name a chair. We must also decide whether we will vote on all proposals at once at the end, or on a rolling basis as they are motioned for vote.
I propose a two-week period for submission and debate of proposals, followed by the traditional five day voting period. We'll vote on all proposals at once, rather than on a rolling basis.
I nominate myself as Chair for obvious reasons.
(10-06-2015, 02:09 PM)sandaoguo Wrote: As set forth in the Great Council Organizing Act, we must first adopt a timeline, procedures, and name a chair. We must also decide whether we will vote on all proposals at once at the end, or on a rolling basis as they are motioned for vote. I agree with a two week submission period. I would like to see a 3-5 day period before the normal 5 day vote takes place though. And I'll third Farengeto as Chair.
What would the 3-5 day period be for, specifically?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk (10-06-2015, 06:21 PM)sandaoguo Wrote: What would the 3-5 day period be for, specifically? I assume he means two weeks new topics can be submitted and discussed freely, but during the final 3-5 days we lock new topic and allow the final debate and drafting. After this point we have a mass voting. Not sure how well the 3-5 days will work in practice but I like the rough idea. Though I'd suggest we don't make the two week date absolute, perhaps have it so that after a specific period the Chair (or someone else) may declare an end of submissions (with three day warning).
The timeline isn't set in stone. It can be altered if 3 people motion a new one.
I'll write up a formal res when I get home tonight. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote:ProceduresI don't really think our traditional 3 days is necessary. I want to put it at 1 day, 2 at most. Thoughts? (10-07-2015, 01:52 PM)sandaoguo Wrote:At least three days. I'd say up to 5 days even. A day is nowhere near enough time. There's no point in rushing so I say leave it at at least three days for what will probably be such significant amendments.Quote:ProceduresI don't really think our traditional 3 days is necessary. I want to put it at 1 day, 2 at most. Thoughts? |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |