We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Random Article
#851

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(Twice_song)
The Sakhalinsk Empire, Legislator of the South Pacific
Currently a citizen and legislator of TSP. I am active as Sverigesriket in Europe.

Complete Conflict of Interest
Reply
#852

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Vito_di_Cadore
Roleplayer
Manager of the TSP and A1-0 maps
Roleplay moderator


Reply
#853

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falko_Wei%C3%9Fpflog
The Lord of Space and Protector of the TARDIS Keys of
The Solar System Scope



Reply
#854

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_aviation_in_India

Legislator | Local Councilor | Aspiring TSP Curmudgeon
Messages archived by the Ministry Of the Regal Executive - Bureaucratic Services

Reply
#855

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmore_River
Woof, woof, I'm a dog I like dogs.

Legislator in the Assembly of the South Pacific.
Member of the Island Democratic Party.
Former Local Councillor in the South Pacific.

 
Reply
#856

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plainfield_(soil)
The Sakhalinsk Empire, Legislator of the South Pacific
Currently a citizen and legislator of TSP. I am active as Sverigesriket in Europe.

Complete Conflict of Interest
Reply
#857

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_...ent_Policy
Roleplayer
Manager of the TSP and A1-0 maps
Roleplay moderator


Reply
#858

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Pérez_(catcher)

Legislator | Local Councilor | Aspiring TSP Curmudgeon
Messages archived by the Ministry Of the Regal Executive - Bureaucratic Services

Reply
#859

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden_...Up_Its_Act
Reply
#860

Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the threatened individual, but a 1976 rehearing of the case by the California Supreme Court called for a "duty to protect" the intended victim. The professional may discharge the duty in several ways, including notifying police, warning the intended victim, and/or taking other reasonable steps to protect the threatened individual.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v...California

Legislator | Local Councilor | Aspiring TSP Curmudgeon
Messages archived by the Ministry Of the Regal Executive - Bureaucratic Services

Reply




Users browsing this thread:
7 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .